![slingo supreme fix issues slingo supreme fix issues](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OJ9oaLUbQwk/maxresdefault.jpg)
The question they’re ultimately considering is whether the limits that the NCAA places on player compensation are illegal. Alston (named for Shawne Alston, a former running back for West Virginia University, who brought the case to the courts along with other athletes).
![slingo supreme fix issues slingo supreme fix issues](http://games.bigfishgames.com/en_slingo-supreme-2/slingo-supreme-2_subfeature.jpg)
In March, the Supreme Court began its landmark hearing on the NCAA’s business model in a case called NCAA v.
![slingo supreme fix issues slingo supreme fix issues](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51AxxPEFP7L.jpg)
There has been a fair amount of confusion in the courts with litigants over the scope and deference the NCAA is entitled to over antitrust law.” “The Supreme Court has not ruled on amateurism and the application of antitrust law in relation to the NCAA in over 35 years. “This is an issue that has been festering for a number of years now,” said Feldman. Gabe Feldman, director of the Tulane Sports Law Program, weighed in on the matter in the Washington Post last December. However, as college sports are increasingly functioning as the primary money-maker at many Division I schools, there’s a growing concern that players are being exploited in order for colleges and universities to profit off their hard work. There are grants and scholarships available as well, but the bottom line is that student athletes aren’t actually profiting from their athletic contribution it’s more like they’re being reimbursed.īy that definition, they wouldn’t be paid for playing at their school. Instead, they’re having certain costs covered, like tuition, room and board, and course materials. The ramifications could have major ripple effects throughout college athletics.Īccording to the current NCAA bylaws, there are strict regulations on how athletes can be compensated by colleges and universities. The case being brought before them focused on how (and how much) these players could be paid by the institutions they play for. As another exciting March Madness tournament was wrapping up this year, the Supreme Court was just beginning to take a hard look at NCAA rules about student athletes.